I have, along with other DMCA rulemaking-hearing participants, received a second question set from the U.S. Copyright Office. The questions are premised by: "For purposes of the question below, please assume that the Register has decided to recommend an exemption to the prohibition for proposed classes 4A through 4H, 11A and 11B, or some portion thereof, relating to motion pictures on CSS-protected DVDs" and ask:
“From your unique perspectives, is there a limitation, either in terms of duration or percentage (or both), which could be incorporated into the definition of an exempted class of works?”
Specifically, the copyright office suggests the following language could possibly be used in the context of finished products (remixes) for crafting the new exemption:
“… the portions of any single work used shall be, collectively, no greater than x minutes in duration and represent no greater than y percent of the duration of that work….”
The questions also acknowledge how creating a quantity limitation might be objectionable to some, but since this is not a redrafting of section 107, but is instead an administrative rulemaking proceeding, they are asking for suggestions from hearing participants nonetheless. They state:
“Again, we recognize that for purposes of fair use, what may be a reasonable duration in one case will not necessarily be a reasonable duration in another case, we are not proposing to codify the fair use doctrine in this rulemaking proceeding. However, this is a regulatory proceeding and for the purposes of promulgating a regulation governing exemptions from the prohibition on circumvention, we are inclined to believe that more specific limitations are advisable so that, at least for purposes of predicting liability under section 1201(a)(1), users will find sufficient guidance in the regulatory text.”
The questions were emailed to hearing participants Friday August 21, 2009 at 5:38 pm, EST. Responses are due September 8, 2009 by 5 pm.
Section 230 Protects Google’s Decision Not To De-Index Content–Bennett v. Google - Dawn J. Bennett was a financial advisor in major trouble with the SEC. She also has a sporting apparel company. She hired an SEO, Pierson, to improve the s...
6 hours ago